Lecture 1: Introduction and Axioms
Formal Euclidean Geometry, Prof. Kontorovich
Rutgers Math Corps, Summer 2025
What is Mathematics at its Core?
Mathematics can be understood in several different ways:
- Manipulation of numbers and variables: This is the computational aspect that most people first encounter in school.
- Extending logic to its limits (and sometimes beyond...): Mathematics pushes reasoning to its absolute boundaries, sometimes revealing paradoxes and surprising results.
- Abstract representation of the real world: Mathematical models help us understand and predict natural phenomena.
- Search for / discovery (invention?) of Universal Absolute Truths: This is perhaps the most profound aspect—mathematics seems to uncover truths that are independent of human culture, time, or even physical reality.
A Small History Lesson
Mathematics has ancient roots, but what, to me, distinguished early mathematical thought from "mere" engineering was their pursuit of abstract truth beyond any possible practical application The following artifacts show this transition from practical calculation to pure mathematical investigation.
YBC 7289: The Ancient Clay Tablet
The YBC 7289 Cuneiform Tablet

This Babylonian clay tablet from ~1800-1600 BCE shows a square with its diagonal
The Mystery: Imagine you find this ball of clay in the ground, dated to approximately 2000 BCE. What is it, and what does it mean?
The Babylonians and Mesopotamians used a base-60 number system. (They're the reason why today there are 60 minutes in an hour, and 60 seconds in a minute!) The numbers on this tablet, when converted to our decimal system, give us:
$$1 + \frac{24}{60} + \frac{51}{3600} + \frac{10}{60^3} \approx 1.414212$$
This approximation of \(\sqrt{2} \approx 1.414213\) is accurate to within one part in a million—far more precision than would ever be needed for any engineering or economic application of that era.
This extraordinary precision distinguishes this object as pure mathematics rather than engineering. It represents knowledge pursued for its own sake, with no practical application.
Why √2? The diagram on the tablet shows the diagonal of a unit square. If we use the side of the square as our unit of measurement, then by what we now call the Pythagorean Theorem (Pythagoras lived around 500 BCE, over 1000 years after this tablet was made...), the diagonal has length \(\sqrt{1^2 + 1^2} = \sqrt{2}\).
This tablet now lives in New Haven, CT at Yale University. "YBC" stands for the Yale Babylonian Collection.
Plimpton 322: Pythagorean Triples
The Plimpton 322 Tablet

Another ancient object from ~2000 BCE, containing large integer solutions to the Pythagorean equation x² + y² = z²
This remarkable tablet (which now lives in NYC at Columbia University) contains sophisticated integer solutions to the Pythagorean equation \(x^2 + y^2 = z^2\). The Babylonians had discovered what we now call Pythagorean triples (again, a millennium before Pythagoras), including some with very large numbers that would have required considerable mathematical sophistication to calculate.
What these ancient objects are "missing" to be Mathematics (as we understand it today) is: PROOF.
The Babylonians had discovered mathematical relationships and could calculate with impressive accuracy, but they worked primarily through observation and computation. They found patterns and verified them through examples, but they did not yet have the concept of proving that these relationships must always hold.
Why did people eventually come to feel that proof was a necessary component of Understanding?
Thales's Theorem: The First Proof
Interactive Demonstration
Move point C around the circle and think about what happens to the angle ∠BCD as C moves?
The interactive above shows a circle centered at A, with diameter BD, and a random point C on the circle.
The Question: How does the angle ∠BCD depend on the position of C? What happens as C moves around the circle?
Observation: Every time we measure the angle, we find it equals 90°! But why does that happen?
If we were ancient Babylonians, simply stating this observed fact might have been sufficient. But for true mathematical understanding, this feels inadequate. We need to know why this is always true.
To the rescue comes Thales of Miletus (c. 624-546 BCE), with the earliest (currently known) proof:
Thales's Theorem
Statement: If you take any circle, draw a diameter, and choose any other point on the circle, then the angle formed at that point is always a right angle (90°).
The Proof
Key Insight: [Proofs often contain a surprising idea (or several such), whose origins seem supernatural, which, once stated, unlock the rest of the argument!] Draw a line from the center A of the circle to point C.
QED = Quod Erat Demonstrandum = "As was to be demonstrated" = "Mic drop"
Thus the ancient Greeks gave birth to the notion of a Proof, which must accomplany any claimed Fact!
But wait. In Step 4, we said that base angles of isosceles triangles are equal. Why is that true? That fact, too, needs its own proof. Same with Step 9, that the angles in a triangle add to 180°; why is that true?
A Fundamental Problem: If every mathematical fact must be proved using other facts, then why are those supporting facts true? This leads to an infinite recursion—we would need to prove facts using other facts, which themselves require proof, and so on forever!
This infinite chain of required proofs creates a serious logical problem. How can we be certain that somewhere in this endless chain, we haven't accidentally used a false statement?
The Need for Axioms
A Dangerous Example
Suppose, buried deep in our chain of reasoning, we had somehow used the "fact" that 0 = 1. This is clearly false, but consider what we could "prove" with it:
False "Proof" of the Riemann Hypothesis (whatever the Riemann Hypothesis is! We don't need to know...):
Assume the Riemann Hypothesis is false. But we know that 0 = 1, which is a contradiction. Therefore, our assumption must be wrong, so the Riemann Hypothesis must be true. QED.
This absurd "proof" illustrates a crucial point: our entire mathematical edifice could collapse if we unknowingly built it upon false foundations. The whole house of cards comes tumbling down if any link in our infinite chain of reasoning contains a false statement.
The Solution: We must start with something that we consciously and conspicuously declare to be true, without giving proof. These foundational statements are called axioms or postulates.
Every mathematical discovery now requires what we might call a "sacred triplet": (Axioms on which the theory is being built, Fact to be established, Proof).
Euclid's Elements
What document represents the ancient epitome of this axiomatic ideal? The answer is Euclid's Elements, written around 300 BCE.
Euclid's Elements is perhaps the most influential mathematics textbook ever written. For over 2000 years, it served as the primary textbook for teaching geometry, and it established the template for how mathematics should be organized: starting with clear definitions and axioms, then building up complex theorems through logical deduction. Until perhaps recently, it was the second most published book of all time, after... The Bible.
You can explore the complete text at David Joyce's edition of Euclid's Elements. Let's dive in!
Euclid's Definitions
Euclid begins by defining the basic objects of geometry; let's look at some of them. Notice how these definitions attempt to capture our intuitive understanding of geometric concepts:
Definition 1
A point is that which has no part.
In other words, a point has no size—no length, width, or thickness. It represents pure position.
Definition 2
A line is breadthless length.
Note: By "line," Euclid means what we would call a "curve"—any one-dimensional path with length but no width.
Definition 4
A straight line is a line which lies evenly with the points on itself.
This poetic definition tries to capture the idea that a straight line has the same direction at every point.
Definition 10
When a straight line standing on a straight line makes the adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right, and the straight line standing on the other is called a perpendicular to that on which it stands.
Why doesn't Euclid just say: a right angle is one measuring 90°? To do that, he would have to explain what it means to measure an angle! To avoid this, he has a clever idea: if two straight lines cross so that adjacent angles are equal, then that's what it will mean for the lines to be perpendicular, meeting at a right angle.
Definition 15
A circle is a plane figure contained by one line such that all the straight lines falling upon it from one point among those lying within the figure are equal to one another.
That is, a circle is the set of all points at equal distance from a center point.
Definition 23
Parallel straight lines are straight lines which, being in the same plane and being produced indefinitely in both directions, do not meet one another in either direction.
Parallel lines are simply ones which never intersect, no matter how far they are extended.
Euclid's Postulates (Axioms)
After establishing definitions, Euclid states his postulates—the fundamental assumptions upon which all geometric reasoning will be based:
Postulate 1
To draw a straight line from any point to any point.
This just says that you can use a straight-edge to connect two points with a line segment.

Postulate 2
To produce a finite straight line continuously in a straight line.
In other words, if you've already drawn a line segment on the page, you can make it a little longer in either direction; this, too, would be accomplished with a straightedge.
Postulate 3
To describe a circle with any center and radius.
This is the "compass postulate" — Euclid is stating that you can draw a circle centered at any point with any radius.
Postulate 4
That all right angles are equal to one another.
Huh? Why is this postulate needed at all? Isn't it obvious that 90° = 90°? Look back at Definition 10: it is a local statement, about two lines intersecting perpendicularly. When two other lines are also perpendicular, maybe their right angle measures some other amount? This postulate ensures that the concept of a right angle is a global, universal quantity, the same whereever it may be measured.
Postulate 5 (The Parallel Postulate)
That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles.
Wait, what?! This last one is a "Postulate"? Really? An obvious fact that requires no further justification?? Read again what it's saying: if two lines are crossed by a transversal, so that the sum of interior angles on one side add up to less than two right angles,
then if you extend those lines on that side, they will eventually intersect (and hence not be parallel). It's the most controversial of Euclid's postulates and thousands of years later led to the development of non-Euclidean geometries... (More on this later.)
Homework Assignment
Prove Euclid's Proposition I.1: "To construct an equilateral triangle on a given finite straight line."
Instructions: Using only Euclid's postulates and the method of compass and straightedge construction, prove that, given two points (and the line segment between them), it is possible to construct an equilateral triangle with that segment as one of its sides.
You may use GeoGebra to help visualize the construction, but your final solution should be a written proof following Euclid's logical structure.
Construction Challenge
Try to construct an equilateral triangle using the given line segment AB. Note: GeoGebra has an "equilateral triangle" tool; but Euclid doesn't! You have to do it just with straightedge and compass.